-share-button” data-via=”ploked” data-count=”vertical” data-url=”http://www.ploked.com/2010/05/10/can-ifind-love-with-my-iphone/”>Tweet
Ploked readers, I must confess something. I’ve been blind to a growing epidemic in America and, possibly, the world. It began in 1975 with the creation of a little company called Apple. While we thought it was just a computer company, we forgot about the millions of people who use all those computers and Apple related products such as your iPods and Macbooks. We forgot that they need love too.
With Windows taking up over 90% of the OS market, it can be hard for these few Apple users to find love, and not even Match.Com or eHarmony would do for their idiosyncratic taste. They needed their own site dating site to cater to them specifically. Enter Cupidtino.
If you’re wondering WTF is up with the name, it’s a mix of “Cupid” and Cupertino, California, the city in which the foundations were laid for what would become Apple, Inc. Cupidtino was created for the Apple users to meet other Apple users on a romantic level. Since the site is still in beta, this is really all the public can see from it at the moment:
“Cupidtino is a beautiful new dating site created for fans of Apple products by fans of Apple products! Why? Diehard Mac & Apple fans often have a lot in common â€“ personalities, creative professions, a similar sense of style and aesthetics, taste, and of course a love for technology. We believe these are enough reasons for two people to meet and fall in love, and so we created the first Mac-inspired dating site to help you find other Machearts around you.
Cupidtino will launch in June 2010 exclusively on Apple platforms â€“ Safari, iPhone and iPad apps. Itâ€™s time to share the love.” Read the rest of this entry »
-share-button” data-via=”ploked” data-count=”vertical” data-url=”http://www.ploked.com/2010/04/27/oh-ning-it-the-cost-of-free/”>Tweet
Ning, a community builder, is now phasing out their free version, leaving all the non-premium networks without a home. While relocating to another place may not be an issue for most people (small, non-serious niche sites), the ones who planned on making a business out of their site are pretty much left with two choices; build elsewhere or upgrade.
If you find yourself leaning towards the â€œbuild elsewhereâ€ option, you might want to take this lesson into consideration: Even free has a price. While itâ€™s a common sense lesson, I constantly run into people who forgo my advice to pay for something they can actually call their own, instead choosing to go the DIY route in search of free.
Free doesn't always equal freedom
I remember a client who wanted to purchase my domain name and servicesâ€¦ only to reverse their decision and use a Ning site instead. After trying for a year, their attempt at branding the site not only failed (the brand name competed against my former brand), but they underestimated the complexity of the net in general. They thought upgrading to premium features would help. They did not understand what they were getting into, causing confusion to both the owners and the members. Oh, and they lost a lot of money in the process.
Are free web apps and sites are the devil? This isnâ€™t always the case. I, myself, use free apps on a daily basis because I understand â€œthe cost of free.” The cost I’m referring to can be expressed in a simple equation:
(Ease of use + Ability to grow) â€“ Frustration with limits = The Cost of Free Read the rest of this entry »
-share-button” data-via=”ploked” data-count=”vertical” data-url=”http://www.ploked.com/2010/03/08/is-chatroulette-a-gamble-you-bet-your-sweet-ass/”>Tweet
If you havenâ€™t already read the previous piece by Sunil on the Chatroulette site, let me give you a short breakdown. Chatroulette is a video chat-based â€œnetworkingâ€ site, consisting of two windows for video. The top window will be a random stranger from anywhere in the world, and the bottom window is you. To the right there is a text window. You can turn your video off, but you wonâ€™t be getting any action on this site without it. Sunil and I had different ideas about whether this site gets a thumbs-up…which has a whole different meaning if you spend enough time on Chatroulette.
My review is slightly tainted after finding myself more often than not coming “face to dick” rather than “face to face” with these strangers. Sunil found the site â€œunorganizedâ€, but I think the better term might be primitive. You can â€œNextâ€ people, â€œReportâ€ people, or â€œStopâ€ – thatâ€™s about it. Â To me, this is actually VERY organized. I had to give my dad a tutorial on Facebook, which might be user-friendly to the networking generation, but Chatroulette is an attractive site for people that find all the profiling and posting and gifting and fanning and followingâ€¦overwhelming. And for people who donâ€™t want a profile for one reason or another, there is another turn-on – no membership required! No email and no password, no way to trace or block anyone who disobeys the site’s BS clause forbidding obscene or pornographic material.
I couldnâ€™t get the site to see my built-in camera. While I was problem solving, I figured I could get some help from this great network of people. But with strangers not being able to see me, I got skipped before I could even type â€œWAIT, HELPâ€ or â€œHaving technical difficulties.” Jeff Foxworthyâ€™s doppelganger skipped me. He appeared to be networking from a suburban, country home den, the kind where your quiet and “keeps-to-himself” neighbor researches the anatomy of young children in a hidden cellar. Read the rest of this entry »